<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill Next Best Blog &#187; thesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bill.crazyriver.com/archives/tag/thesis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bill.crazyriver.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s about the little things now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technology in Education &#8211; its the culture, stupid.</title>
		<link>http://bill.crazyriver.com/archives/343?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=technology-in-education-its-the-culture-stupid</link>
		<comments>http://bill.crazyriver.com/archives/343#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.crazyriver.com/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As is was summarized in a presenation I heard in the late 1980s, "you can't create change without taking into account the culture of the classroom".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend asked about my Master&#8217;s Thesis the other day. I was hunting through old computer files (c.1990) and found quotes that still seem to have a ring of reality.</p>
<p>My paper in 1990 barely considered networked computing, internet or anything like that. In fact it was sparked by a Presidential Commission on Instructional Technology that goes back 20 years before that (1970). In reviewing all the 1950s and 1960s era &#8216;technology&#8217; that was applied to education.</p>
<p>In part it found:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Indifference or Antipathy toward Using Technology in Education<br />
2. Poor Programs<br />
3. Inadequate Equipment<br />
4. Inaccessibility<br />
5. Teachers Not Trained in Instructional Technology<br />
6. Media Specialists Excluded from Central Planning<br />
(Commission on Instructional Technology, 1970, 78-81)</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>“Today technology touches only a small fraction of instruction. Colleges, universities, and schools have been using television, films, computers, or programmed texts in instruction, but to a limited extent. The results are mixed, with some institutions making a creative and sustained use of the new media while others, after an initial burst of enthusiasm, quickly losing interest.” (Commission on Instructional Technology, 1970, p8)</p></blockquote>
<p>As is was summarized in a presenation I heard in the late 1980s, &#8220;any technology will fail if it doesn&#8217;t tak into account the culture of the classroom&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the world of &#8216;social networking&#8217; the message of understanding culture is more important than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bill.crazyriver.com/archives/343/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
